We’re going to merge with the machines so this will never be a problem, right?

From Stampy's Wiki
Revision as of 15:53, 4 February 2022 by 756254556811165756 (talk | contribs) (Added ID to page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Canonical Answer

The concept of “merging with machines,” as popularized by Ray Kurzweil, is the idea that we will be able to put computerized elements into our brains that enhance us to the point where we ourselves are the AI, instead of creating AI outside of ourselves.

While this is a possible outcome, there is little reason to suspect that it is the most probable. The amount of computing power in your smart-phone took up an entire room of servers 30 years ago. Computer technology starts big, and then gets refined. Therefore, if “merging with the machines” requires hardware that can fit inside our brain, it may lag behind the first generations of the technology being developed. This concept of merging also supposes that we can even figure out how to implant computer chips that interface with our brain in the first place, we can do it before the invention of advanced AI, society will accept it, and that computer implants can actually produce major intelligence gains in the human brain. Even if we could successfully enhance ourselves with brain implants before the invention of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), there is no way to guarantee that this would protect us from negative outcomes, and an ASI with ill-defined goals could still pose a threat to us.

It's not that Ray Kurzweil's ideas are impossible, it's just that his predictions are too specific, confident, and reliant on strange assumptions.

Stamps: None
Show your endorsement of this answer by giving it a stamp of approval!

Canonical Question Info
(edits welcome)
Asked by: NotaSentientAI
OriginWhere was this question originally asked
/r/ControlProblem's FAQ
Date: 2021/07/14